claimhteoir wrote:I'd have to say that historical re-enactment is living history.

sorry if i'm asking: what is living history?
is it
re-living history?
or is it showing to the "public" what the "public" wants to see?
there are so many definitions to living history these days, that I (and people might disagreewith me, every one is free to their own opinion, but this is the accepted believe of many European groups) follow the opinion that re-enactment is not living history, but the attempt to relive and recreate the situations of times gone by. where living history shows what people looked and dressed like at the time.
I don't mean to offend anyone, but I believe that there is a big difference between re-enatment and living history. (maybe it is from the german way of re-enatment i grew up with, maybe it is my own ignorance?)